19 June 2008
When it comes to the law relating to adverse possession of land, it’s frankly a bit of a mess.
Any claim for possession depends on whether the land is registered or unregistered and how many years the claimant has been in occupation.
Broadly, the position is as follows:
Pye (Oxford Limited) v Caroline Graham
The Grahams won a case involving their continued occupation of a plot of land, having successfully argued before the House of Lords that they had entitlement to the land by more than 12 years adverse possession. Pye couldn’t recover the land because it was prevented by the Limitation Acts from taking any court action. (A claim for possession had to be made within 12 years).
Pye took the case to the European Court claiming that loss of entitlement to a valuable piece of land contradicted the Human Rights Act 1998 which states that everyone – including a company – is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions.
Although the Act didn’t apply as the case was brought before it came into force, Pye then argued that it was entitled to compensation from the Government. The European Court agreed but Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling took the matter to the Grand Chamber of the Court and won.
The court declared that:
So how can a landowner protect himself?
The watchwords should be “Get off my land”!
For further information contact Andrew Gough on 01227 763939.
‹ Back
Please call 0845 603 10 57 to speak to a member of our team